Steven Dutch, Professor Emeritus, Natural and Applied Sciences, Universityof Wisconsin - Green Bay
TEXT: SAGAN, Cosmos; Any standard college style manual
|January 16 - 18||Cosmos: Shores Of The Cosmic Ocean||The Scale Of The Universe And Human History||Sagan Ch. 1|
|January 23 - 25||Cosmos: Harmony Of The Worlds||The Discovery Of Scientific Laws||Sagan Ch. 3,7|
|Jan. 30 - February 1||Shape Of The World||The Earliest High-Tech Superpower Rivalries||Web|
|February 6 - 8||QUIZ: Spaceflight: I||Venturing Into Space||Web|
|February 13 - 15||Spaceflight excerpts||Sputnik, Apollo, and the Cold War||Web|
|February 20 - 22||Cosmos: Heaven And Hell||Earth and Venus. Catastrophes in Nature||Sagan Ch. 4|
|Feb. 27-March 1||Cosmos: Blues For A Red Planet||Mars in Fact and Fancy||Sagan Ch. 5|
|March 6 - 8||Cosmos: Travelers' Tales||Jupiter and the spirit of exploration in two eras||Sagan Ch. 6|
|March 10 - 18||Spring Break|
|March 20 - 22||New ideas about solar systems||Web|
|March 27 - 29||QUIZ: Cosmos: The Lives Of The Stars||Stars, Atoms and Galaxies||Sagan Ch. 8-10|
|April 3 - 5||Galaxies and the Universe||Web|
|April 10 - 12||Cosmos: One Voice In The Cosmic Fugue||Evolution, Life, and Time||Sagan Ch. 2|
|April 17 - 19||Cosmos: Encyclopedia Galactica||Close encounters of various kinds||Sagan Ch. 11, 12|
|April 24 - 26||QUIZ: Video Excerpts||Mirror in the Sky: What our ideas of aliens tell about us.||Web|
|May 1 - 3||Video Excerpts||Mirror in the Sky: What our ideas of aliens say about us.||Web|
FINAL EXAM: Thursday May 11, 8:00-10:00 PM, ES 328
|Grading:||F||Less than 70% of top score|
|Writing Assignment I||10%||C||70|
|Writing Assignment II||20%||BC||75|
|Attendance and participation||20%||AB||85|
|A||More than 90% of top score|
All writing assignments must be turned in to pass the course. Work thatappears to have been hastily assembled solely to meet this requirement will notcount. Late assignments penalized 20% per day.
How accurate is Wikipedia as a reference? How well is it regarded by experts in various fields? How would you advise someone to use it compared to a standard print encyclopedia?.
Guidelines for referencing are available on the page Referencesfor College Papers. You are responsible for knowing and applying theseguidelines. The following references are not to be used:
Standards I apply in grading writing are explained on the page What is an A?You are responsible for knowing and applying these standards. In simple terms, Iexpect professional quality prose of the sort you would expect to see in Time, Newsweek,or a good newspaper. A style manual is required for the course, therefore, youhave no excuse for poor writing.
A minimally acceptable paperfree of defects will get 7 points on a 10-point scale. Papers that explore thetopic in depth, show originality or extra effort will be awarded sores of 8-10.
Any of the following defects will be docked one point per occurrence.
When Carl Sagan's Cosmos series came out in 1979, the late George O'Hearn of theEducation Program and I immediately decided to develop a course based on the series. Wetaught the course for the first time during the fall of 1981. It was very successful. Itaught the course again during the summer of 1982 but only a handful of students enrolled.Because of that low enrollment, the course languished for several years (UW-Green Bay wasunder extreme pressure to raise enrollments in those days). Finally, in the fall of 1985,I had a one-course reassignment for serving as assistant chair of NAS. I decided to tryoffering the course as an overload. It drew a very good enrollment and has been offeredjust about every year since. I consider reviving Cosmos one of my bestaccomplishments as an instructor.
During the 90's, it started to become clear that Cosmos was becoming dated.Unfortunately, the things that distracted people most were not areas where the science hadbecome outdated, but comparatively trivial issues like changing clothing and hair styles.In some areas, especially Solar System exploration and cosmology, science has progressedenormously since Cosmos was filmed. For the most part, the series stands upsurprisingly well. Nevertheless, I changed the title of the course to Explorations ofthe Universe to eliminate any commitment to Cosmos and to allow the freedom toincorporate a broader range of other material. I have dropped a few of the weaker Cosmosepisodes and added material from other sources.
Explorations of the Universe differs from a conventional astronomy course inthat it spends a lot of time on the broader social and historical context of science. Forexample, accurate determination of the shape of the earth was one of the major scientificproblems of the 1700's. To determine the shape of the earth accurately, you need to dovery accurate local surveys at widely separeted places in the tropics and in the arctic.You need to be able to mount sizable expeditions, get them there, supply them, and protectthem. You also need world-class industry to make the extremely precise instruments needed,and world-class scientists to develop the mathematical techniques to analyze the data. Youneed, in short, to be a superpower. In the 1700's, Britain and France engaged in perhapsthe first modern high-tech superpower rivalry, a forerunner of the Apollo Program and StarWars.
Prerequisites for the course include any of a number of basic science courses, butthese are not show-stoppers. A student with no scientific background at all might havedifficulty, but if you have had reasonable exposure to science you should do all right. Ifin doubt, we can discuss the matter.
Since I was teaching the course as an overload myself when I revived it, I decided thebasic philosophy should be to concentrate more on enjoying Sagan's series than on grading.That is still my belief. This should be an opportunity for students to learn about some ofthe exciting things science has discovered about the universe, without having to worryabout being penalized for exploring outside their comfort zone.
I used to think it was just about impossible to get a D or F in this course, buteventually, alas, I was proven wrong. It became apparent that some students were treatingthe course as a blow-off course. It is emphatically not. I will make any reasonable (andsometimes unreasonable) accommodation to students who have problems with illness, work, ordifficulty understanding the material. I will not accommodate students who simply wantthree easy credits.
I never met or even corresponded with Sagan, who died December 20, 1996. I differfrom him on a number of serious points. Nevertheless I am an enthusiastic fan of his work
One of the most common criticisms of Sagan is that he's "arrogant". Sagandoes not pretend that junk stops being junk if enough people believe in it. Believers inUFO's and the paranormal loathe Sagan for that reason. But it's not arrogance to statesomething boldly if the facts back you up. One of the organizing themes in Cosmosis the conflict between science and anti-intellectualism, a conflict science seems to belosing at the moment.
Sagan has his flaws. It sometimes unnerves students to hear me criticize Sagan while atthe same time using his videos. I consider his occasional flaws to be good teachingpoints. They show that even a top scholar can make mistakes or fall prey to prejudices andstereotyping, they illustrate the need to use all sources critically, and they show thatthere are legitimate differences of opinion among scientists. Sagan's forays intoreligion, philosophy and politics provide a good case study in the limitations ofscientific credentials outside of science.
Return to Professor Dutch's home page
Created 23 Dec 1996; Last Update 31 May 2020
Not an official UW-Green Bay site